<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andy at The Movies &#187; Spider-Man 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyatthemovies.com/tag/spider-man-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyatthemovies.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spider-Man 4 in 2011? Not If The Vulture Says So.</title>
		<link>http://www.andyatthemovies.com/spider-man-4-in-2011-not-if-the-vulture-says-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andyatthemovies.com/spider-man-4-in-2011-not-if-the-vulture-says-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Raimi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spider-Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spider-Man 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spider-Man 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spider-Man 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyatthemovies.com/?p=4618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you like Spider-Man 3? Sucker. OK, we can&#8217;t hold it against you. There&#8217;s some googly-eyed Sam Raimi ridiculousness going on in there that fares the loathed entry better than most of its ilk. Sure there was far too much going on and the studio&#8217;s insistence of shoe-horning Venom into the mix only served to dilute and make the whole thing ridiculous. That was because A) Raimi is a classic Spider-Man enthusiast who understands the old villains (Sandman, Doctor Octopus, The Green Goblin) but didn&#8217;t really &#8220;get&#8221; the more recent Venom and B) trying to marry a studios insisted vision with your own can often end badly. Such was the case for Spider-Man 3 and Raimi don&#8217;t want no Spider-Man 3. Still, the studio (rightly so) wanted Raimi back for Spider-Man 4 and spent gobs to get him. But recently, problems are percolating, threatening to judo-chop the shooting schedule and May 6, 2011 release date right in the tenderloin. Apparently, Raimi wants Spider-Man 4&#8216;s villain to be The Vulture. The studio, in their ever present quest for marketability and sexiness, is pushing for another sub-plot romance with the character &#8220;Black Cat&#8221; and wants any villain but the Vulture. Plot massaging and various writers haven&#8217;t been able to make peace with it all and subsequently? Constipation! Disagreements like this aren&#8217;t uncommon for collaborative projects, but to Sony I say,&#8221;Muzzle it&#8221;. When given free reign, Raimi created a money-magnet franchise entry and one of the best sequels of all time (and a fine movie to boot) in Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2. When forced to meddle and acquiesce, Raimi created a soggy-plotted cluster of suffocation in Spider-Man 3. You paid to get Raimi back. Trust your man, trust that The Vulture will work and let&#8217;s get crackin&#8217;.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andyatthemovies.com/spider-man-4-in-2011-not-if-the-vulture-says-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

